MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035097950 · doi:10.1080/00207540412331282024

Implementing global factory schedules in the face of stochastic disruptions

2005· article· en· W2035097950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Production Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsVale (Canada)PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)
FundersIntel CorporationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsFactory (object-oriented programming)Face (sociological concept)Computer scienceOperations managementBusinessOperations researchEngineeringManufacturing engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of implementing global factory schedules developed from an optimization-based heuristic in a manufacturing facility with executional uncertainties in the form of machine failures is considered. A simple procedure in which jobs are dispatched on the shop floor is proposed based on their start times in the global schedule is proposed. The performance of the proposed procedure relative to a number of well-known dispatching rules is evaluated using a simulation model of a scaled-down semiconductor wafer fabrication facility. Results indicate that the procedure combining the global schedule and dispatching outperforms the benchmark dispatching rules in terms of several performance measures as long as the level of variability in the system is compatible with the frequency of rescheduling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it