MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035323568 · doi:10.4043/21015-ms

Well Design Requirements For Deepwater And Arctic Onshore Gas Hydrate Production Wells

2010· article· en· W2035323568 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClathrate hydrateMethaneSubmarine pipelinePermafrostPetroleum engineeringGeologyHydrateNatural gasArcticEnvironmental scienceOceanographyWaste managementChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Gas hydrate wells will have a number of production challenges, including maintaining commercial gas flows with high water production rates; operating with low temperatures and low pressures in the wellbore; flow assurance issues including hydrates and freezing in the wellbore; controlling formation sand production into the wellbore; and ensuring well structural integrity with reservoir subsidence and/or changes in geo-mechanical properties along the wellbore. This paper addresses these production issues and outlines the design requirements for typical deepwater and arctic onshore gas hydrate production wells. Background Methane gas hydrates are solid crystalline compounds of water and methane gas, in which the molecules of methane occupy the lattices of ice-like crystal structures. Methane hydrates can form and accumulate in sandstones, shales, or silts, where methane and water is present under the necessary conditions of low temperature and high pressure, as illustrated in the following figure. Hydrates can occupy the pore spaces of sands and silts, and can also be found in fractures or lenses, and in some cases can act as the matrix supporting sediments. In North America, onshore gas hydrates can be found under permafrost in the US and Canadian Arctic regions, and offshore gas hydrates can be found in the deepwater margins around the continent. Internationally, offshore methane hydrates have been discovered in deepwater margins in many locations around the world. There has been no consistent effort to map and evaluate this resource on a global scale; therefore, current estimates of gas in place volumes vary widely, possibly up to many thousands of TCF (Moridis 2010). Given the sheer magnitude of the resource, ever increasing global energy demand, and the finite volume of conventional fossil fuel reserves, gas hydrates are emerging as a potential energy source for a growing number of nations, even if only a small portion of gas hydrates can be economically recovered. The attractiveness of gas hydrates is further enhanced by the environmental desirability of natural gas as opposed to solid or liquid fuels. Thus, the appeal of gas hydrates accumulations as future hydrocarbon gas sources is rapidly increasing and their production potential clearly demands technical and economic evaluation. The past decade has seen a marked acceleration in gas hydrate research and development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it