MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035663515 · doi:10.1109/tase.2013.2248000

Detection of Correlated Alarms Based on Similarity Coefficients of Binary Data

2013· article· en· W2035663515 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSimilarity (geometry)Correlation coefficientBinary numberALARMFalse alarmCorrelationData miningPearson product-moment correlation coefficientComputer scienceBinary dataPattern recognition (psychology)Data correlationAlgorithmMathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the statistical analysis for alarm signals in order to detect whether two alarm signals are correlated. First, a similarity measurement, namely, Sorgenfrei coefficient, is selected among 22 similarity coefficients for binary data in the literature. The selection is based on the desired properties associated with specialities of alarm signals. Second, the distribution of a so-called correlation delay is shown to be indispensable and effective for the detection of correlated alarms. Finally, a novel method for detection of correlated alarms is proposed based on Sorgenfrei coefficient and distribution of the correlation delay. Numerical and industrial examples are provided to illustrate and validate the obtained results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it