The Canada‐U.S. border after September 11th: The politics of risk constructed
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Many significant changes have occurred in North American security and border management since September 11, 2001. There has been much speculation about how Canada‐U.S. relations will change, as well as the broader issue of what this means for North American regionalism economic integration and transnationalism. This chapter suggests that if we are to find the answers to these questions, we need to appreciate the context in which security, border management and transnational cooperation has evolved in North America in recent times. We also need to appreciate that the final outcome will not be solely the result of U.S. decision‐making, but will involve negotiating consensus and cooperation with its neighbors in order to manage the risks posed by closed or open borders. The way in which security risk is constructued, politicized and publicly discussed in instrumental in maintaining the border and in setting the tone for border management. So also are issues such as technological application, identity politics and historical nationalisms, institutional capacity for transnationalism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it