The impact of a four‐month day treatment programme on alexithymia in eating disorders
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract High prevalence rates of alexithymia have been reported in eating‐disordered patients. The aim of this study was first to investigate whether a 4‐month day hospital treatment leads to a decrease in alexithymia in eating‐disordered patients and second to see whether alexithymia predicts short‐term outcome in this population. The Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS) and the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) were given to 47 patients with anorexia nervosa ( n = 18), bulimia nervosa ( n = 25) and eating disorders not otherwise specified ( n = 4) respectively at the beginning and at the end of a 4‐month treatment programme. Comparison of pre‐ and post‐treatment scores showed significant declines in the EDI as well as in the TAS. However, baseline scores for alexithymia did not predict post‐treatment outcome. We conclude that even highly alexithymic patients benefit from psychological treatment which encourages understanding and expressions of emotion and also leads to significant reduction in eating disorder‐related symptoms. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it