MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035914573 · doi:10.1109/smc.2013.325

Truncation Error Compensation in Kernel Machines

2013· article· en· W2035914573 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsComputer scienceKernel (algebra)Benchmark (surveying)Series (stratigraphy)Truncation (statistics)Time seriesCompensation (psychology)AlgorithmMean squared errorArtificial intelligenceData miningMachine learningMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The analysis and prediction of time series data has played an important role for intelligent systems used in the area of cybernetics and human-machine interaction. Time series prediction is especially important in the case of unreliable communication of data acquired by intelligent systems. Computationally efficient kernel based regression algorithms have allowed for the prediction of non-linear relationships within time series data. In this paper, we present the smooth delta corrected kernel least mean square (SDC-KLMS) algorithm. The SDC-KLMS scales in linear time with the number of samples stored, hence making it computationally efficient. We present a theoretical motivation for our algorithm and we experimentally show how our approach overcomes a limitation imposed by the use of a finite storage buffer. Experiments with simulated, benchmark, and real world data were conducted to verify the accuracy of our algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207