MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Stress corrosion cracking of oil and gas pipelines in near neutral pH environment: review of recent research

2008· article· en· W2036100236 on OpenAlexaffabout
Wenyue Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Materials · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStress corrosion crackingCrackingCorrosionSlow strain rate testingMaterials scienceStress (linguistics)MetallurgyCarbonatePipeline transportPetroleum engineeringForensic engineeringEnvironmental scienceComposite materialGeologyEngineeringEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the discovery of transgranular stress corrosion cracking (SCC) on a Canadian gas transmission line in 1985, much research has been conducted in the past 20 years. Findings of the effects of operating conditions, metallurgical and the environmental factors have been useful in preventing and mitigating failures. Several overviews of this problem can be found in the literature and the purpose of this update is to review the research results produced since the turn of the century. The recent report of SCC under static stressing conditions confirms that the cracking is indeed a true SCC process, although the rate of which is low without dynamic loading. In contrast to the high pH pipeline stress corrosion cracking in the carbonate–bicarbonate solution, this forms of cracking in dilute near neutral environment takes much longer time to initiate. Once initiated, the crack growth rate is highly sensitive to the loading rate of the applied mechanical force.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy MaterialsSame topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207