MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036155475 · doi:10.3810/pgm.2013.03.2619

Variability in Intravenous Immunoglobulin G Regimens for Autoimmune Neuromuscular Disorders

2013· article· en· W2036155475 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePostgraduate Medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of LethbridgeCSL Behring
KeywordsMedicineChronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathyDosingMyasthenia gravisMultifocal motor neuropathyInternal medicineCumulative doseImmunoglobulin EAntibodyImmunoglobulin GGastroenterologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: We reviewed the intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIG) dispensing records of a specialty pharmacy to characterize the IVIG treatment regimens used for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and myasthenia gravis (MG) in community practice. METHODS: Anonymized records were selected based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes and IVIG treatment for > 1 month. Each patient's immunoglobulin G (IgG) dose per infusion (mg/kg/dose) was multiplied by the number of doses per month (30.5 days divided by the dosing interval in days) to yield the total monthly dose (mg/kg/month). Data were analyzed and summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Forty-six patients (median age, 56.5 years; range, 8-86 years) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Thirty-one patients with CIDP received IgG at 7- to 92-day intervals (mean [standard deviation (SD)], 28 [16] days). The mean (SD) IgG dose was 75 (60) g/dose, equivalent to 866 (623) mg/kg/dose and 1145 (778) mg/kg/month. Six patients with stable MG received IVIG or subcutaneous IgG at 3.5- to 61-day intervals (28 [20] days) at a mean (SD) IgG dose of 39 (15) g/dose, equivalent to 405 (108) mg/kg/dose and 783 (680) mg/kg/month. Nine patients with MG with acute exacerbations received IgG at 7- to 42-day intervals (22 [12] days) at a mean (SD) dose of 40 (21) g/dose, equivalent to 403 (172) mg/kg/dose and 641 (288) mg/kg/month. One patient with CIDP and 4 patients with MG were treated with weekly subcutaneous IgG injections. CONCLUSION: Although patients with CIDP and MG are treated with mean total monthly IgG doses similar to those approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, the individual doses and intervals vary considerably, suggesting that physicians may be adjusting IgG dosing according to each patient's clinical condition and treatment response. Further study is necessary to determine the criteria used to adjust IgG treatment regimens and whether these adjustments optimize clinical outcomes while limiting overall costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it