Polarized Th2 Cytokine Production in Patients with Hypertrophic Scar Following Thermal Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Following thermal injury, hypertrophic scar (HSc) is a frequent and severe form of fibrosis of the skin, which limits movement and compromises the cosmetic appearance and function of the skin. Prolonged pruritus and dysesthesia are also common problems in the previously injured, fibrotic tissues, as current understanding of the pathogenesis is limited, and few effective therapies exist, as with other fibroproliferative disorders (FPD). To investigate the role of T cells and their cytokines in the development of HSc, intracellular cytokine synthesis of circulating T cells was measured serially in burn patients using flow cytometry from the time of injury to over a 1-year period during which many patients developed HSc. Within 1 month of injury, low interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma)-positive T cells (Th1) were found in association with low interleukin-12 (IL-12) and absent IFN-gamma cytokine levels in the serum. IL-4-positive Th 2 cells, however, were significantly increased compared with normal controls by 2 months postinjury. In burn patients with HSc, serum IL-10 and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) levels were also significantly increased early after burn injury in patients who later developed HSc compared with normal volunteers and with a subset of burn patients who did not develop HSc, before returning to normal levels after 6 months. Activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) demonstrated that mRNA for IFN-gamma was present only in normal volunteers or patients without HSc but was undetectable in HSc patients. IL-4 mRNA levels were increased in the PBMCs of burn patients with HSc. In HSc tissues, IL-4 mRNA was increased, whereas, IFN-gamma mRNA was reduced compared with normal skin and mature scar. Increased CD3(+) and CD4(+) cells were present in HSc tissues compared with normal skin and were coexpressed with the fibrogenic cytokine TGF-beta. These longitudinal studies in human patients with HSc suggest that fibrosis in the skin is associated with a polarized Th2 systemic response to injury that leads to increased T cells and their Th2 fibrogenic cytokines in tissues and the development of fibrosis and HSc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".