MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036817298 · doi:10.1109/jstars.2014.2314216

Compressed Sensing ISAR Reconstruction in the Presence of Rotational Acceleration

2014· article· en· W2036817298 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Shaharyar Khwaja, Xiao–Ping Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverse synthetic aperture radarAccelerationCompressed sensingFocus (optics)Computer scienceSynthetic aperture radarComputer visionIterative reconstructionRotation around a fixed axisFrame (networking)Artificial intelligenceAngular accelerationRadar imagingRadarPhysicsOpticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present an inverse synthetic aperture radar (ISAR) reconstruction method from compressively sensed data using a new dictionary that takes into account rotational acceleration. Unlike traditional compressed sensing (CS) ISAR imaging methods, where the dictionary either ignores this acceleration or assumes the scatterers as static, our method can deal with maneuvering motion consisting of rotational acceleration. The method can also focus images when data are not acquired in a continuous frame. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated by analysis. Simulation examples verify this analysis and show that the presented method can focus data consisting of scatterers undergoing rotational acceleration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote SensingSame topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207