MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037436387 · doi:10.1037/1064-1297.15.6.546

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and Alzheimer's disease subtypes: An alternate hypothesis to global cognitive enhancement.

2007· review· en· W2037436387 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Case Reports and Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionDiseasePsychologyAcetylcholinesteraseCholinergicAlzheimer's diseaseDementiaCholinergic neuronNeuroscienceMedicineInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cholinergic neurons are extensively implicated in cognitive functioning. Cholinergic deficiency is a widely accepted hypothesis of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is the impetus for the development of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChIs). Studies on the efficacy of ChIs emphasize global cognitive improvement and the amelioration of neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with AD. The authors propose that the current perception of ChIs as global cognitive enhancers may be misleading. It is hypothesized that these drugs improve cognition in specific AD subtypes primarily through psychotropic properties that facilitate attentional processing. In effect, increased attentional capacity through diminished neuropsychiatric symptoms serves to augment results on global cognitive measures: in particular, AD subtypes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.391 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it