MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Inexpensive Kinematic Attitude Determination from MEMS-Based Accelerometers and GPS-Derived Accelerations

2002· article· en· W2037457085 on OpenAlexafffund
Cameron Ellum, Naser El‐Sheimy

Bibliographic record

VenueNAVIGATION Journal of the Institute of Navigation · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKillam Trusts
KeywordsAccelerometerKinematicsGlobal Positioning SystemAzimuthTrajectoryControl theory (sociology)AccelerationGeodesyDifferentiatorComputer scienceReference frameSimulationFrame (networking)PhysicsMathematicsGeologyGeometryComputer visionClassical mechanicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: This paper describes an inexpensive kinematic attitude determination technique that uses GPS and a triaxial accelerometer. By removing the GPS-derived accelerations from the specific forces sensed by the accelerometers, the gravity vector in body frame of the vehicle is determined. From this, roll and pitch can be calculated. Azimuth is provided by the GPS-measured trajectory. Details are given on the system components and configuration, and on the kinematic attitude determination algorithm. A test of the technique shows that the root-mean-square (RMS) error is less than 1 deg. An analysis of Taylor series finite-difference differentiators in the frequency domain is also given. From this analysis, it is shown that for second derivatives, direct differentiators are preferable to cascaded differentiators unless the suppression of high frequencies is desired.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNAVIGATION Journal of the Institute of NavigationSame topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207