MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037464547 · doi:10.1002/dir.1020

Understanding IT-enabled interactivity in contemporary marketing

2001· article· en· W2037464547 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Interactive Marketing · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Marketing and Social Media
Canadian institutionsShell (Canada)University of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteractivityConceptualizationDigital marketingExtant taxonMarketing researchMarketingMarketing managementMarketing scienceDatabase transactionRelationship marketingBusinessKnowledge managementComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The past decade has witnessed the emergence of a new phenomenon in marketing practice and research in terms of the rapid and widespread diffusion of information technology. Of particular interest in the marketing literature is the notion of interactivity within and among firms and customers. To better understand how IT-enabled interactivity impacts contemporary marketing practice, this paper synthesizes the extant and emerging literature to develop two related conceptual frameworks useful for discussion and empirical investigation. Building on an established conceptualization of marketing practices that comprises four different approaches (Transaction, Database, Interaction, and Network marketing), the first framework introduces a fifth approach: e-Marketing. The second framework relates these five marketing approaches to three distinct roles for information technology in the organization. Implications are offered for both managers and researchers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.142
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it