Removal of wavelet dispersion from ground-penetrating radar data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Wavelet dispersion caused by frequency-dependent attenuation is a common occurrence in ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data, and is displayed in the radar image as a characteristic “blurriness” that increases with depth. Correcting for wavelet dispersion is an important step that should be performed before GPR data are used for either qualitative interpretation or the quantitative determination of subsurface electrical properties. Over the bandwidth of a GPR wavelet, the attenuation of electromagnetic waves in many geological materials is approximately linear with frequency. As a result, the change in shape of a radar pulse as it propagates through these materials can be well described using one parameter, Q∗, related to the slope of the linear region. Assuming that all subsurface materials can be characterized by some Q∗ value, the problem of estimating and correcting for wavelet dispersion becomes one of determining Q∗ in the subsurface and deconvolving its effects using an inverse-Q filter. We present a method for the estimation of subsurface Q∗ from reflection GPR data based on a technique developed for seismic attenuation tomography. Essentially, Q∗ is computed from the downshift in the dominant frequency of the GPR signal with time. Once Q∗ has been obtained, we propose a damped-least-squares inverse-Q filtering scheme based on a causal, linear model for constant-Q wave propagation as a means of removing wavelet dispersion. Tests on synthetic and field data indicate that these steps can be very effective at enhancing the resolution of the GPR image.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".