MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037949939 · doi:10.1177/0143034302023002919

Adolescents' Perception of Parental Involvement in Schooling

2002· article· en· W2037949939 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSchool Psychology International · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParental Involvement in Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpenness to experiencePsychologyDevelopmental psychologyAttendanceAutonomyPerceptionIdentity (music)Social psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the types of parental involvement activities that adolescents are willing to support. It also investigates the extent to which adolescents' support is related to their gender and autonomy. The results showed that even though adolescents welcome most of the parental involvement activities, the support is generally stronger among girls than among boys and that parental physical attendance in school activities is not wished. Data also revealed a positive relationship between adolescents' openness to parental involvement activities and their level of work-orientation and identity. Gender effects are discussed in light of the hypothesis of girls' earlier maturation combined with greater receptiveness to social influence. Further, higher boys' work-orientation and girls' identity scores predict the likelihood of their support of a greater number of parental involvement activities. These results point out to the importance of taking into account adolescents' views of parental involvement activities when designing family-school partnerships programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it