MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038006265 · doi:10.1175/jtech1987.1

SPARC: New Cloud, Snow, and Cloud Shadow Detection Scheme for Historical 1-km AVHHR Data over Canada

2007· article· en· W2038006265 on OpenAlexaffabout
Konstantin Khlopenkov, Alexander P. Trishchenko

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPixelAdvanced very-high-resolution radiometerRemote sensingSnowSkyCloud computingSatelliteShadow (psychology)Image resolutionMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceRadiometryPolar orbitWeather satelliteComputer scienceGeologyGeographyArtificial intelligenceAstronomyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The identification of clear-sky and cloudy pixels is a key step in the processing of satellite observations. This is equally important for surface and cloud–atmosphere applications. In this paper, the Separation of Pixels Using Aggregated Rating over Canada (SPARC) algorithm is presented, a new method of pixel identification for image data from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) on board the NOAA satellites. The SPARC algorithm separates image pixels into clear-sky and cloudy categories based on a specially designed rating scheme. A mask depicting snow/ice and cloud shadows is also generated. The SPARC algorithm has been designed to work year-round (day and night) over the temperate and polar regions of North America, for current and historical AVHRR/NOAA High-Resolution Picture Transmission (HRPT) and Local Area Coverage (LAC) data with original 1-km spatial resolution. The algorithm was tested and applied to data from the AVHRR sensors flown on board NOAA-6 to NOAA-18. The method was employed in generating historical clear-sky composites for the 1982–2005 period at daily, 10-day, and monthly time scales at 1-km resolution for an area of 5700 km × 4800 km centered over Canada. This region also covers the northern part of the United States, including Alaska, as well as Greenland and the surrounding oceans. The SPARC algorithm is designed to produce an aggregated rating that accumulates the results of several tests. The magnitude of the rating serves as an indicator of the probability for a pixel to belong to the clear-sky, partly cloudy, or overcast categories. The individual tests employ the spectral properties of five AVHRR channels, as well as surface skin temperature maps from the North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) dataset. These temperature fields are available at 32 km × 32 km spatial resolution and at 3-h time intervals. Combining all test results into one final rating for each pixel is beneficial for the generation of multiscene clear-sky composites. The selection of the best pixel to be used in the final clear-sky product is based on the magnitude of the rating. This provides much-improved results relative to other approaches or “yes/no” decision methods. The SPARC method has been compared to the results of supervised classification for a number of AVHRR scenes representing various seasons (snow-free summer, winter with snow/ice coverage, and transition seasons). The results show an overall agreement between the automated (SPARC) and the supervised classification at the level of 80% to 91%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations118
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic TechnologySame topicAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsFrench-language works237,207