MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038319434 · doi:10.1080/00221686.2012.659840

Energy dissipation and flow characteristics of baffles and sills on stepped spillways

2012· article· en· W2038319434 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydraulic Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaffleDissipationSpillwaySillMechanicsFlow (mathematics)InletGeologyRange (aeronautics)Geotechnical engineeringMaterials sciencePhysicsThermodynamicsGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, a two-dimensional physical model was used to evaluate the effectiveness of adding baffles and sills at step edges or of shifting them from step edges of a 1V:1H sloping, short, sharp- or round-crested stepped spillway with an ogee inlet. A comparison between different configurations of baffles and sills was carried out with respect to the energy dissipation and the flow characteristics. The baffle-shifted round-crested spillway gives the smallest discharge required for the onset of a skimming flow among all other configurations. The baffle-edged chute dissipates more energy than the sill-edged spillway. Shifting baffles or sills from the sharp edges decreases the energy dissipation. Shifting baffles or sills from the round-crested spillway increases the energy dissipation in the range of the discharges studied. Empirical equations for energy dissipation are introduced for practical application of spillways of comparable similar conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it