MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038409208 · doi:10.1049/ip-gtd:20045058

Application of adverse and extreme adverse weather: modelling in transmission and distribution system reliability evaluation

2006· article· en· W2038409208 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Generation Transmission and Distribution · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Reliability and Maintenance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdverse weatherReliability (semiconductor)Reliability engineeringExtreme weatherTransmission (telecommunications)Computer scienceEnvironmental scienceTransmission systemMeteorologyEngineeringTelecommunicationsClimate changeGeographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The physical environment in which a transmission and distribution system resides has a significant impact on the resulting reliability of the network. The inclusion of weather conditions in the reliability analyses of transmission and distribution systems is discussed. A series of weather models is presented with application to a practical transmission/distribution system. The conventional approach to predictive reliability assessment using single- and two-state weather models is briefly illustrated. A three-state weather model is presented to incorporate failures occurring in major adverse weather conditions. The system reliability indices obtained using the weather models clearly show the need to incorporate weather effects into reliability analyses. Results obtained without weather considerations can be quite misleading and optimistic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it