MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038728399 · doi:10.1002/xrs.860

Three decades of <i>in vivo</i> x‐ray fluorescence of lead in bone

2005· article· en· W2038728399 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueX-Ray Spectrometry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExcited stateIn vivoLead (geology)Lead exposureChemistryX-rayBone remodelingBiophysicsRadiochemistryEndocrinologyMedicineInternal medicineAtomic physicsBiologyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In vivo measurements of lead in bone were first made in the early 1970s. Of the three systems that have been used ( 57 Co excited K, 125 I or polarized excited L, 109 Cd excited K), 109 Cd excited K x‐ray fluorescence has been most widely adopted. Bone lead measured in vivo has been shown to reflect cumulative exposure, but the rate of input to bone varies with level of exposure. Chelated lead does not relate directly to bone lead. Endogenous exposure has been highlighted by bone lead measurements and this release of lead from bone and hence the half‐life of lead in bone have been shown to depend on age and on intensity of lead exposure. Thus x‐ray spectrometry has made a significant contribution to the understanding of long‐term human lead metabolism. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it