MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038728399 · doi:10.1002/xrs.860

Three decades of <i>in vivo</i> x‐ray fluorescence of lead in bone

2005· article· en· W2038728399 on OpenAlexafffund
David R. Chettle

Bibliographic record

VenueX-Ray Spectrometry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExcited stateIn vivoLead (geology)Lead exposureChemistryX-rayBone remodelingBiophysicsRadiochemistryEndocrinologyMedicineInternal medicineAtomic physicsBiologyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In vivo measurements of lead in bone were first made in the early 1970s. Of the three systems that have been used ( 57 Co excited K, 125 I or polarized excited L, 109 Cd excited K), 109 Cd excited K x‐ray fluorescence has been most widely adopted. Bone lead measured in vivo has been shown to reflect cumulative exposure, but the rate of input to bone varies with level of exposure. Chelated lead does not relate directly to bone lead. Endogenous exposure has been highlighted by bone lead measurements and this release of lead from bone and hence the half‐life of lead in bone have been shown to depend on age and on intensity of lead exposure. Thus x‐ray spectrometry has made a significant contribution to the understanding of long‐term human lead metabolism. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueX-Ray SpectrometrySame topicHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityFrench-language works237,207