MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038805152 · doi:10.1021/ac301680q

Present and Future Challenges in Food Analysis: Foodomics

2012· article· en· W2038805152 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad
KeywordsChemistryFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development and application of analytical methods and techniques in food science has grown parallel to the consumers concern about what is in their food and the safety of the food they eat.To give an adequate answer to the raising consumers' demands, food analysts have to face increasingly complex challenges that require using the best available science and technology.A good portion of this complexity is due to the so-called globalization and the movement of food and related raw materials worldwide, which are generating contamination episodes that are becoming also global.An additional difficulty is that many products contain multiple and processed ingredients, which are often shipped from different parts of the world, and share common storage spaces and production lines.As a result, ensuring the safety, quality, and traceability of food has never been more complicated and necessary than today. 1 The first goal of food analysis has traditionally been, and still is, to ensure food safety.To meet this goal, food laboratories are being pushed to exchange their classical procedures for modern analytical techniques that allow them to give an adequate answer to this global demand.Besides, the new European regulations in the EU countries (e.g., Regulation EC 258/97 or EN 29000 and subsequent issues), the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act in the U.S., and the Montreal Protocol have had a major impact on food laboratories.Consequently, more powerful, cleaner and cheaper analytical procedures are now sought by food chemists, regulatory agencies, and quality control laboratories.These demands have increased the need for more sophisticated instrumentation and more appropriate methods able to offer better qualitative and quantitative results while increasing the sensitivity, precision, specificity, and/or speed of analysis. 2part from these essential considerations, there are also a large number of food properties for which analytical chemistry will play a crucial role.Just to mention a few, the identification of the effect of food production, processing, preparation, and use on nutrient content, toxic contaminant generation, and inactivation of naturally occurring toxins; the compliance with food and trade laws ensuring food safety and traceability; the detection of adulteration and product tampering; the characterization of chemical composition of foods; the study of food rheology, morphology, structure or surface; the analysis of physical, physicochemical, thermal, or microbiological properties; the evaluation of sensory characteristics, etc.These properties will have a critical influence on food safety, quality, processing, and acceptance. 3urrently, there is also a general trend in food science to link food and health.Thus, food is considered today not only a source of energy but also an affordable way to prevent future diseases.The number of opportunities (e.g., new methodologies, new generated knowledge, new products, etc.) derived from this trend are impressive and it includes, e.g., the possibility to account for food products tailored to promote the health and well-being of groups of population identified on the basis of their individual genomes.The introduction in this area of research of advanced "omics" approaches such as Foodomics 4 have made it possible that food scientists can face problems unthinkable a few years ago.However, to achieve these goals, researchers involved in modern food science need an adequate background on advanced analytical tools in order to extract all the potential from these new methodologies.Usually, a sine qua non condition is to work within multidisciplinary teams in order to be able to face the huge complexity of the problem and to handle the generated results in a rational way.Thus, food analysis is, nowadays, one of the most important application areas of analytical chemistry.In this work, the main analytical techniques employed in food analysis at the beginning of the 21st century will be presented together with their

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it