MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038846828 · doi:10.7202/015127ar

La perception sauvage. Étude sur les ordres sensoriels des enfants " sauvages "

2003· article· fr· W2038846828 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicCategorization, perception, and language
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La perception sauvage Étude sur les ordres sensoriels des enfants " sauvages " Cet essai se veut une étude de trois cas classiques d'enfants " sauvages " : l'enfant sauvage de l'Aveyron, les enfants-loups de l'Inde et Kaspar Hauser. Ces cas sont examinés pour ce qu'ils peuvent nous apporter sur les ordres sensoriels, ou modes de perception, de tels enfants. On a constaté que chaque enfant connaît un ordre sensoriel particulier, lequel semble avoir été déterminé par son environnement. Une fois ramené à la société, l'enfant se voit contraint de former ses sensations au régime sensoriel de la culture dominante. Ces trois récits démontrent les différentes façons selon lesquelles les sensations peuvent être ordonnées, à l'intérieur et à l'extérieur de la culture. Ils laissent aussi entrevoir à quel point la société détermine ce que l'on perçoit et la manière dont on le perçoit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.541
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it