Alternative Digit Sets for Nonadjacent Representations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is known that every positive integer n can be represented as a finite sum of the form $n={\textstyle\sum} a_i 2^{i}$, where $a_i\in \{0,1,-1\}$ for all i, and no two consecutive ai's are nonzero. Such sums are called nonadjacent representations. Nonadjacent representations are useful in efficiently implementing elliptic curve arithmetic for cryptographic applications. In this paper, we investigate if other digit sets of the form {0,1,x}, where x is an integer, provide each positive integer with a nonadjacent representation. If a digit set has this property, we call it a nonadjacent digit set (NADS). We present an algorithm to determine if {0,1,x} is an NADS and, if it is, we present an algorithm to efficiently determine the nonadjacent representation of any positive integer. We also present some necessary and sufficient conditions for {0,1,x} to be an NADS. These conditions are used to exhibit infinite families of integers x such that {0,1,x} is an NADS, as well as infinite families of x such that {0,1,x} is not an NADS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it