MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039207402 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2003-003-3

Higher Order Tangents to Analytic Varieties along Curves

2003· article· en· W2039207402 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Rüdiger Braun, Reinhold Meise, B. A. Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMeromorphic and Entire Functions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Mathematical SocietyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsTangentVariety (cybernetics)Zero (linguistics)Limit (mathematics)Pure mathematicsMathematical analysisDimension (graph theory)Order (exchange)Algebraic varietyAlgebraic numberSpace (punctuation)Differential (mechanical device)Analytic functionGeometryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let V be an analytic variety in some open set in which contains the origin and which is purely k-dimensional. For a curve γ in , defined by a convergent Puiseux series and satisfying γ(0) = 0, and d ≥ 1, define Vt := t−d(V − (t)). Then the currents defined by Vt converge to a limit current Tγ,d[V] as t tends to zero. Tγ,d[V] is either zero or its support is an algebraic variety of pure dimension k in . Properties of such limit currents and examples are presented. These results will be applied in a forthcoming paper to derive necessary conditions for varieties satisfying the local Phragmén-Lindelöf condition that was used by Hörmander to characterize the constant coefficient partial differential operators which act surjectively on the space of all real analytic functions on .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MathematicsSame topicMeromorphic and Entire FunctionsFrench-language works237,207