MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039552460 · doi:10.1029/2000jc000294

An experimental study of turbulent flow over a low‐angle dune

2002· article· en· W2039552460 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyAngle of reposeFlumeTurbulenceBedformGeomorphologySand dune stabilizationFlow (mathematics)Sediment transportOpen-channel flowSecondary flowMean flowMechanicsGeotechnical engineeringSedimentPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many large, sand bed alluvial channels are dominated by dunes that possess low‐angle lee sides, often <10°, which play a critical role in the transportation of sediment and generation of significant bed form roughness. Despite the fact that these low‐angle dunes are very common in such channels many current models of dune flow dynamics are based on bed forms with an angle of repose slip face that generates a zone of permanent separated flow in the dune lee. Study of flow associated with low‐angle dunes in the field is inherently difficult since it is usually both hard to measure very near the bed and hard to quantify the nature of turbulence over these bed forms. Results from a detailed scale model experimental study of flow over a low‐angle dune, which is based on a prototype dune from the Fraser River, Canada, present a necessary link between flume and field studies and document the origins of macroturbulence associated with these bed forms. Two‐dimensional laser Doppler anemometer measurements over a low‐angle dune (maximum lower lee side slope = 14°) show that dune morphology exerts a dominant control on the turbulent flow, causing flow deceleration in the lower lee and development of an intermittent layer of shear at the interface with the higher velocity flow above. The scale model confirms that permanent flow separation does not occur over low‐angle dunes but, instead, is replaced by a small region (here ∼7% of the dune wavelength in length) of intermittent flow reversal, which may be present for up to 4% of the time. Shear layers generated along this small zone of decelerated and/or separated flow in the lower lee have a much smaller velocity differential than is characteristic of shear layers generated by flow separation in the lee of angle of repose dunes. Turbulence production associated with low‐angle dunes is dominated by eddies generated along this shear layer, which produce highly variable horizontal and vertical velocities and large Reynolds stresses in this region. These results show that macroturbulence associated with low‐angle dunes is generated by intermittent separation or shear layer generation due to velocity gradients established in the zone of lee side flow expansion. Velocity profiles and maps of turbulence structure from the scale model are in reasonable agreement with field measurements from low‐angle dunes in natural sand bed rivers. These results highlight the need to consider the temporal evolution and intermittency of shear layer behavior, often very near the bed, when interpreting the generation of macroturbulence and dispersal of sediment associated with low‐angle dunes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it