MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039868012 · doi:10.1177/1744935912444356

Caution! This historiography makes wide turns: Historic turns and breaks in management and organization studies

2012· article· en· W2039868012 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement & Organizational History · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Organizational Studies
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoriographyNarrativeOrganization studiesComparative historical researchEpistemologySociologyBusiness historyNarrative historyRealismHistoryPoint (geometry)AestheticsCritical realism (philosophy of perception)Social scienceLiteraturePhilosophyArtArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In enacting the three movements needed to make a ‘historic turn’ in Management and Organization Studies (MOS) this paper investigates the proposed concept of the ‘historical break’ – a point where MOS ceased to be historical in its research endeavours. By eschewing the methodological realism that dominates much of the history in management research in favour of directly engaging with a theory of History, the construction of a historical narrative is presented. This narrative may be read as a ‘history of the present’ and a potential explanation for the absence of engagement with history in MOS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it