MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040002908 · doi:10.1159/000123455

Contrasting Actions of Amino Acids, Acetylcholine, Noradrenaline and Leucine Enkephalin on the Excitability of Supraoptic Vasopressin-Secreting Neurons

2008· article· en· W2040002908 on OpenAlexaff
Elisabeth Arnauld, M. Cirino, Barry S. Layton, Leo P. Renaud

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroendocrinology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal General Hospital
FundersMedical Research CouncilNational Institute of Mental HealthInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
KeywordsVasopressinAcetylcholineOxytocinInternal medicineEndocrinologySupraoptic nucleusChemistryNeurotransmitterExcitatory postsynaptic potentialEnkephalinInhibitory postsynaptic potentialNeuropeptideHypothalamusGlutamate receptorNeuroscienceBiologyReceptorCentral nervous systemOpioidMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The preferential release of the neurohypophyseal hormones vasopressin and oxytocin by appropriate stimuli implies that neurons secreting each hormone receive different afferent connections and may therefore contain membrane receptors for different neurotransmitters. Since electrophysiological studies on rat supraoptic nucleus (SON) neurosecretory neurons suggest that the activated vasopressin-secreting neuron may be selectively identified by a phasic activity pattern, extracellular recordings were performed in pentobarbital anesthetized male Sprague-Dawley rats to compare the responses of 59 phasically-active SON neurosecretory cells to several neurotransmitter candidates endogenous to SON and applied by microiontophoresis. Among excitatory agents, most SON cells demonstrated a brisk depolarization to aspartate and glutamate; quiescent cells could also be induced into phasic activity by continuous application of either amino acid with low currents. During applications of acetylcholine and nicotine, phasically active neurons demonstrated elongated periods of continued activity, but without an increase in overall firing frequency, suggesting a possible mechanism for cholinergic enhancement of vasopressin release. In contrast, norepinephrine (NE) exerted an opposite action by either terminating a burst of activity prematurely or decreasing the number of action potentials per burst; some cells displayed a prolonged arrest of phasic activity for several minutes following NE applications. This mechanism of action could explain any inhibitory effect of NE on vasopressin secretion. We observed no apparent tachyphylaxis to repeated NE applications. GABA applications also terminated phasic activity prematurely, but cell firing resumed within seconds of removal of the application currents. Leucine enkephalin exerted a weak depressant action on the excitability of a small percentage of phasically-active SON neurons. For further comparison, we tested these agents on 18 continuously-active (possible oxytocin-secreting) SON neurosecretory neurons. Most of these neurons demonstrated changes in excitability similar to that noted on phasically-active cells; however, the duration of drug action seldom outlasted the period of its application. One exception was the observation that acetylcholine, but not nicotine, depressed the firing of a portion of the continuously-active SON neurosecretory cell population. These extracellular observations provide preliminary evidence of differences in the neuropharmacological properties of SON putative vasopressin- and oxytocin-secreting neurons that may be better clarified with detailed intracellular measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations123
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroendocrinologySame topicNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorFrench-language works237,207