MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040131580 · doi:10.1109/tim.2010.2045552

Optically Modulated Probe for Precision Near-Field Measurements

2010· article· en· W2040131580 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotodiodeOpticsSensitivity (control systems)Polarization (electrochemistry)Near and far fieldOmnidirectional antennaMaterials sciencePerturbation (astronomy)PhysicsElectronic engineeringAntenna (radio)EngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the design and implementation of an accurate, sensitive, and cost-effective near-field (NF) probe are discussed. The probe is based on the modulated scatterer technique (MST), providing very low perturbation on the field to be measured. It consists of a commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) photodiode chip and an antenna acting as a scatterer. The optically modulated scatterer (OMS) essentially makes the NF measurements perturbation free. A matching network is added to the probe structure to increase its sensitivity. The radiation characteristics of the probe, including cross-polarization response and omnidirectional sensitivity, are both theoretically and experimentally investigated. Finally, the performance and reliability of the probe are studied by comparing the measured NF distributions to the simulated distributions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it