Enhanced weak integral formulation for the mixed (u_,p_) poroelastic equations
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- none
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: Simulation or modelingConsensus signal: Simulation or modeling
- Genre
- Candidate signal: MethodsConsensus signal: none
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.809
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 0.305
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
Recently Atalla et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 1444–1452 (1998)] and Debergue et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 2383–2390 (1999)] presented a weak integral formulation and the general boundary conditions for a mixed pressure-displacement version of the Biot’s poroelasticity equations. Finite element discretization was applied to the formulation to solve 3D vibro-acoustic problems involving elastic, acoustic, and poroelastic domains. In this letter, an enhancement of the weak integral formulation is proposed to facilitate its finite element implementation. It is shown that this formulation simplifies the assembly process of the poroelastic medium, the imposition of its boundary conditions, and its coupling with elastic and acoustic media.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Topic
- Numerical methods in engineering
- Field
- Engineering
- Canadian institutions
- Université de Sherbrooke
- Funders
- not available
- Keywords
- PoromechanicsBiot numberDiscretizationBoundary element methodMathematical analysisFinite element methodDisplacement (psychology)Integral equationMathematicsCoupling (piping)Boundary value problemPhysicsPorous mediumMechanicsMaterials sciencePorosity
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes