MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040366480 · doi:10.1109/tnano.2015.2426149

Nanostructured Thermionics for Conversion of Light to Electricity: Simultaneous Extraction of Device Parameters

2015· article· en· W2040366480 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaCanada Foundation for InnovationBritish Columbia Innovation CouncilBCFRST Foundation
KeywordsThermionic emissionCommon emitterWork (physics)Flexibility (engineering)Space chargeElectricity generationElectricityMaterials scienceVoltageMechanical engineeringComputer scienceEngineering physicsOptoelectronicsPower (physics)Electrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringElectronThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermionic conversion involves the direct conversion of heat, including light-induced heat, from a heat source, e.g., solar energy, to electricity. Although the concept is almost a hundred years old, the progress of thermionic convertors has been limited by issues such as the space-charge effect and availability of materials with desirable mechanical and electrical properties, while maintaining a low work function. Nanotechnology could help address some of the main challenges that thermionic convertors face. However, existing models, which were developed for macroscopic convertors, are not capable of describing all aspects of nanostructured devices. We present a method to evaluate the output characteristics of thermionic convertors with a higher precision than the existing models and the ability to simulate a broader range of parameters, including temperatures, active surface areas, interelectrode distances, and work functions. These features are crucial for the characterization of emergent devices due to the unknowns involved in their internal parameters; the model's high numerical precision and flexibility allows one to solve the reverse problem and to evaluate the internal parameters of the device from a set of simple experimental data. As an experimental case, a carbon nanotube forest was used as the emitter and locally heated to thermionic emission temperatures using a 50-mW-focused laser beam. The current-voltage characteristics were measured and used to solve the reverse problem to obtain the internal parameters of the device, which were shown to be consistent with the values obtained using other methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it