On the Accuracy of Beam-Averaged Interferometric Heat Transfer Measurements
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laser interferometry can be used in a three dimensional temperature field to measure the average fluid temperature and heat transfer rate, integrated over the length of an experimental model. However, such measurements are inherently approximate when the surface temperature varies in the direction of the test/object beam. In this study an analysis is performed to determine the accuracy of beam-averaged heat transfer rate measurements made in ideal gases. Two analysis methods are considered. The first method is based on extrapolation of the near-wall temperature field to obtain the surface gradient. In the second method, the temperature gradient at the surface is obtained directly from the gradient of the fringe field. The results show that the intrinsic error in the measurements depends strongly upon the form and magnitude of the temperature variation in the light beam direction. Although the error in the measured heat transfer rate is shown to be small for many commonly encountered conditions, it can be greater than ten percent in extreme cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it