MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040595110 · doi:10.1080/17449359.2015.1029943

Under (Canadian) Cover: Standard Oil (NJ) and the International Petroleum Company in Peru and Colombia, 1914–1948

2015· article· en· W2040595110 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement & Organizational History · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicNatural Resources and Economic Development
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubsidiaryMultinational corporationLatin AmericansPetroleum industryForeign direct investmentPetroleumInternational tradeEconomyBusinessEconomicsFinancePolitical scienceEngineeringLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1914, Standard Oil (New Jersey) made its first major investments in Latin America, in Peru and shortly thereafter in Colombia. For strategic reasons Standard Oil set up these ventures through a Canadian subsidiary, Imperial Oil, establishing the International Petroleum Company. As a result, over the next three decades Standard's operations in these countries featured a complex set of relationships involving the host countries, Peru and Colombia, but also its own subsidiaries which became integrated companies in their own right. In addition, Standard Oil, which had initially intended to develop oil supplies for its domestic market, became increasingly tied to the growing markets of the host countries. This study indicates the complicated nature of foreign direct investment undertakings and the unintended consequences of multinational enterprise strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it