MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040671543 · doi:10.1089/neu.2006.23.1713

Orthostatic Hypotension and Autonomic Pathways after Spinal Cord Injury

2006· article· en· W2040671543 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurotrauma · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSupine positionOrthostatic vital signsSpinal cord injuryAnesthesiaCardiologySpinal cordHeart rateInternal medicineBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) are prone to orthostatic hypotension (OH). We aimed to develop a simple bedside test to evaluate autonomic control following chronic SCI, and to identify those most at risk of OH and cardiovascular dysfunction. We studied 14 subjects with cervical SCI, 11 with thoracic SCI, and 17 able-bodied controls. We continuously recorded heart rate (HR; ECG) and beat-to-beat systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP) and mean (MAP) arterial pressures (Finometer) while supine, and following the passive assumption of an upright seated position. Stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) were calculated. Plasma catecholamines were determined. Motor and sensory loss was assessed using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale. Autonomic pathways were assessed from sympathetic skin responses (SSR). Cervical SCI subjects had lower supine HR, SAP, and noradrenaline levels than thoracic SCI and controls (p < 0.05), and lower DAP and MAP than controls (p < 0.05). When upright, HR increased in all groups (p < 0.05); SAP, DAP, and MAP increased (p < 0.01) in thoracic SCI and controls, but not in cervical SCI. Cervical SCI had larger postural falls in SV (p < 0.05) and CO, with smaller increases in TPR than the other two groups. Upright catecholamine levels were lower in cervical SCI (p < 0.05) than thoracic SCI and controls. Completeness of SCI assessed by ASIA scale did not necessarily correlate with autonomic completeness assessed by SSR. Cardiovascular control during orthostasis was impaired and OH was common in cervical SCI, but not thoracic SCI. SSR may identify those at greatest risk of orthostatic hypotension and impaired cardiovascular control. We advocate that assessments of autonomic function be included in the neurological evaluation of SCI, in addition to the ASIA assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it