MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040963032 · doi:10.1142/s0219649211002973

Effectiveness of Heuristic Based Approach on the Performance of Indexing and Clustering of High Dimensional Data

2011· article· en· W2040963032 on OpenAlexaff
Alan Chen, Shang Gao, Tamer N. Jarada, Ming Zhang, Christos Pavlatos, Panagiotis Karampelas, Reda Alhajj

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Information & Knowledge Management · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Clustering Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisComputer scienceSearch engine indexingData miningCurse of dimensionalityHierarchical clusteringDBSCANDimensionality reductionClustering high-dimensional dataHeuristicCURE data clustering algorithmCorrelation clusteringMachine learningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data in practical applications (e.g., images, molecular biology, etc) is mostly characterised by high dimensionality and huge size or number of data instances. Though, feature reduction techniques have been successful in reducing the dimensionality for certain applications, dealing with high dimensional data is still an area which has received considerable attention in the research community. Indexing and clustering of high dimensional data are two of the most challenging techniques that have a wide range of applications. However, these techniques suffer from performance issues as the dimensionality and size of the processed data increases. In our effort to tackle this problem, this paper demonstrates a general optimisation technique applicable to indexing and clustering algorithms which need to calculate distances and check them against some minimum distance condition. The optimisation technique is a simple calculation that finds the minimum possible distance between two points, and checks this distance against the minimum distance condition; thus reusing already computed values and reducing the need to compute a more complicated distance function periodically. Effectiveness and usefulness of the proposed optimisation technique has been demonstrated by applying it with successful results to clustering and indexing techniques. We utilised a number of clustering techniques, including the agglomerative hierarchical clustering, k-means clustering, and DBSCAN algorithms. Runtime for all three algorithms with this optimisation scenario was reduced, and the clusters they returned were verified to remain the same as the original algorithms. The optimisation technique also shows potential for reducing runtime by a substantial amount for indexing large databases using NAQ-tree; in addition, the optimisation technique shows potential for reducing runtime as databases grow larger both in dimensionality and size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Information & Knowledge ManagementSame topicAdvanced Clustering Algorithms ResearchFrench-language works237,207