MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040975520 · doi:10.1109/bibm.2012.6392695

Efficient filtration for similarity search with spaced k-mer neighbors

2012· article· en· W2040975520 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNearest neighbor searchSimilarity (geometry)SeedingComputer scienceSet (abstract data type)HeuristicSensitivity (control systems)AlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Filtration (mathematics)SpeedupData miningSelection (genetic algorithm)Sequence (biology)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsImage (mathematics)Parallel computingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In DNA and protein sequence similarity search, seeding (or filtration) has been widely used to trade search sensitivity with search speed. In this paper, a new seeding method, called spaced k-mer neighbors, is introduced to provide a more efficient tradeoff between the speed and sensitivity in protein similarity search. The new method pre-selects a set of spaced k-mers as neighbors, and uses the neighbors to detect hits between the query and database sequences. An efficient heuristic algorithm is proposed for the neighbor selection. We demonstrate that the method can improve the tradeoff efficiency over existing seeding methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207