MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041035205 · doi:10.1016/j.anihpc.2006.02.002

Anti-self-dual Lagrangians: Variational resolutions of non-self-adjoint equations and dissipative evolutions

2006· article· en· W2041035205 on OpenAlexafffund
Nassif Ghoussoub

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de l Institut Henri Poincaré C Analyse Non Linéaire · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre de Recherches Mathématiques
KeywordsDissipative systemDual (grammatical number)Classical mechanicsPhysicsSelf-adjoint operatorMathematical physicsMathematicsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop the concept and the calculus of anti-self-dual ( ASD ) Lagrangians and their derived vector fields which seem inherent to many partial differential equations and evolutionary systems. They are natural extensions of gradients of convex functions – hence of self-adjoint positive operators – which usually drive dissipative systems, but also provide representations for the superposition of such gradients with skew-symmetric operators which normally generate unitary flows. They yield variational formulations and resolutions for large classes of non-potential boundary value problems and initial-value parabolic equations. Solutions are minima of newly devised energy functionals, however, and just like the self (and anti-self) dual equations of quantum field theory (e.g. Yang–Mills) the equations associated to such minima are not derived from the fact they are critical points of the functional I , but because they are also zeroes of suitably derived Lagrangians. The approach has many advantages: it solves variationally many equations and systems that cannot be obtained as Euler–Lagrange equations of action functionals, since they can involve non-self-adjoint or other non-potential operators; it also associates variational principles to variational inequalities, and to various dissipative initial-value first order parabolic problems. These equations can therefore be analyzed with the full range of methods – computational or not – that are available for variational settings. Most remarkable are the permanence properties that ASD Lagrangians possess making their calculus relatively manageable and their domain of applications quite broad. Résumé On introduit et développe la notion de Lagrangien anti-autodual qui apparait dans plusieurs problèmes de géométrie et de physique théorique. Cette classe inclut les champs de gradient de fonctions convexes qui sont à la base de systèmes dissipatifs, mais aussi la superposition de ces derniers avec les opérateurs anti-symétriques qui, par contre, engendrent des flots conservatifs. Comme pour les équations autoduales de Yang–Mills, ces Lagrangiens permettent la résolution variationnelle de plusieurs équations différentielles du premier ordre qui ne rentrent donc pas dans le cadre de la théorie de Euler–Lagrange. Les solutions proviennent de minima de certaines (nouvelles) fonctionelles d'énergie, mais les équations ne sont pas derivées du fait qu'elles sont des points critiques, mais du fait qu'elles sont des racines de Lagrangiens positifs associés obtenus par une extension d'une astuce de Bogomolnyi. Cette nouvelle approche variationelle a plusieurs avantages, surtout qu'elle est applicable dans plusieurs situations, puisque la classe des Lagrangiens anti-autoadjoints est assez riche, étant stable – entre autres – par les opérations du calcul fonctionnel de l'analyse convexe, ainsi que celui des opérateurs anti-symétriques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de l Institut Henri Poincaré C Analyse Non LinéaireSame topicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207