MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041079585 · doi:10.1142/s0218127413501459

SYNCHRONIZATION AND STABILIZATION OF MULTI-SCROLL INTEGER AND FRACTIONAL ORDER CHAOTIC ATTRACTORS GENERATED USING TRIGONOMETRIC FUNCTIONS

2013· article· en· W2041079585 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityWilfrid Laurier University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTrigonometric functionsAttractorMathematicsChaoticSynchronization (alternating current)Inverse trigonometric functionsPiecewise linear functionInteger (computer science)Sigmoid functionApplied mathematicsArtificial neural networkControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Mathematical analysisControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sigmoidal functions are usually used to characterize the behavior of dynamical systems, in particular, for neural networks. Recently, multilevel piecewise linear functions have been employed in cellular neural networks (CNN). In this paper, we first use the inverse trigonometric function, tan -1 (x), to generate a series of trigonometric functions to obtain one-, two- and three-directional multi-scroll integer and fractional order chaotic attractors. Then, based upon the properties of the chaotic systems, simple feedback control laws are designed to stabilize or synchronize the integer and fractional order chaotic systems. Numerical simulations are presented to demonstrate the applicability of theoretical predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it