MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041079585 · doi:10.1142/s0218127413501459

SYNCHRONIZATION AND STABILIZATION OF MULTI-SCROLL INTEGER AND FRACTIONAL ORDER CHAOTIC ATTRACTORS GENERATED USING TRIGONOMETRIC FUNCTIONS

2013· article· en· W2041079585 on OpenAlexafffund
Fei Xu, Pei Yu, Xiaoxin Liao

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityWilfrid Laurier University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTrigonometric functionsAttractorMathematicsChaoticSynchronization (alternating current)Inverse trigonometric functionsPiecewise linear functionInteger (computer science)Sigmoid functionApplied mathematicsArtificial neural networkControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Mathematical analysisControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sigmoidal functions are usually used to characterize the behavior of dynamical systems, in particular, for neural networks. Recently, multilevel piecewise linear functions have been employed in cellular neural networks (CNN). In this paper, we first use the inverse trigonometric function, tan -1(x), to generate a series of trigonometric functions to obtain one-, two- and three-directional multi-scroll integer and fractional order chaotic attractors. Then, based upon the properties of the chaotic systems, simple feedback control laws are designed to stabilize or synchronize the integer and fractional order chaotic systems. Numerical simulations are presented to demonstrate the applicability of theoretical predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and ChaosSame topicChaos control and synchronizationFrench-language works237,207