MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<i>Die Herz‐Turbine</i>: Rhythm and Urban Experience in the Poetry of Gerrit Engelke (1890–1918)

2008· article· en· W2041236253 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe German Quarterly · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Literature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryModernityRhythmArtVitalismLiteraturePhilosophyAestheticsArt historyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although once celebrated as a representative of “workers' poetry” ( Arbeiterdichtung ), the expressionist poet Gerrit Engelke (1890–1918) has, with the exception of a few canonical poems, largely been forgotten today. But Engelke's poetry merits a rereading on account of its early and sustained engagement with industrialization. More specifically, it offers an insightful case study into the cross‐currents linking expressionist aesthetics and industrial science on account of the author's efforts to imagine urban modernity and—the role of poetry in the modern world— through the lens of rhythm . Exploring the connections between Engelke's lyric and modern discourses on rhythm (work science, vitalist philosophy, dance and film), I argue that Engelke saw poetic rhythm as a means of overcoming, via aesthetics, what Georg Simmel had identified as the growing chasm between subjective and objective culture in the industrial world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it