Detection of Hepatitis C Virus in the Corneas of Seropositive Donors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: There have been no reported cases of hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission by corneal transplantation. Previous studies have also shown no correlation between HCV seropositivity and the presence of HCV RNA in the corneal tissues. This study aims to investigate such correlation and to provide further evidence to the possible transmissibility of HCV via corneal grafts. METHODS: Of the 1,619 potential corneal donors to the Eye Bank of Canada over a 1-year period, 15 tested HCV-positive by the second-generation Abbott HCV enzyme immunoassay (EIA) 2.0 assay. Their sera were further tested with second-generation radio-immunoblot assay (RIBA-II), and their corneas (29 altogether) were processed for identification of HCV RNA using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: Of the 29 corneas from seropositive donors, HCV RNA was detected in 7 (24.1%). CONCLUSION: This is the first study in the literature that demonstrates a significant correlation between HCV seropositivity and the presence of HCV in the corneas. Routine HCV serologic testing for all potential corneal donors and rejection of corneal tissues based on HCV seropositivity is certainly justifiable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it