MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041503135 · doi:10.1021/op050126m

A Practical Guide for Buffer-Assisted Isolation and Purification of Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Amine Derivatives from Their Mixture

2005· article· en· W2041503135 on OpenAlexaff
Guoxiang Ma, Amitabh Jha

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganic Process Research & Development · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary (astronomy)Reductive aminationChemistryAmine gas treatingTertiary amineYield (engineering)AlkylationDistillationOrganic chemistryChromatographyColumn chromatographyAminationFractional distillationCombinatorial chemistryCatalysisMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A number of reactions involving primary amines such as N-alkylation, reductive amination, Mannich reaction, etc. produce mixtures of primary, secondary, and tertiary amines. The isolation and purification of individual constituents of these mixtures is often carried out by column chromatography or fractional distillation. For an industrial large-scale process, it would be desirable to avoid column chromatography and distillation (if the product is temperature sensitive) without significantly losing the product yield. We have devised an elegant method which uses relatively inexpensive buffer medium of varying pH to selectively separate primary, secondary, and tertiary amines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.100

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganic Process Research & DevelopmentSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyFrench-language works237,207