MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041503135 · doi:10.1021/op050126m

A Practical Guide for Buffer-Assisted Isolation and Purification of Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Amine Derivatives from Their Mixture

2005· article· en· W2041503135 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganic Process Research & Development · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary (astronomy)Reductive aminationChemistryAmine gas treatingTertiary amineYield (engineering)AlkylationDistillationOrganic chemistryChromatographyColumn chromatographyAminationFractional distillationCombinatorial chemistryCatalysisMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A number of reactions involving primary amines such as N-alkylation, reductive amination, Mannich reaction, etc. produce mixtures of primary, secondary, and tertiary amines. The isolation and purification of individual constituents of these mixtures is often carried out by column chromatography or fractional distillation. For an industrial large-scale process, it would be desirable to avoid column chromatography and distillation (if the product is temperature sensitive) without significantly losing the product yield. We have devised an elegant method which uses relatively inexpensive buffer medium of varying pH to selectively separate primary, secondary, and tertiary amines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.582

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it