MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041667144 · doi:10.1109/acc.2014.6859237

A complete algorithm for the infinite horizon sensor scheduling problem

2014· article· en· W2041667144 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCovarianceBounded functionEstimatorKalman filterComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)A priori and a posterioriMathematical optimizationAlgorithmJob shop schedulingCovariance intersectionScheduleMathematicsCovariance matrixEstimation of covariance matricesStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we study the problem of scheduling sensors to estimate the state of a linear dynamical system. The estimator is a Kalman filter and we seek to optimize the a posteriori error covariance over an infinite time horizon. We characterize the exact conditions for the existence of a schedule with uniformly bounded estimation error covariance. Using this result, we construct a scheduling algorithm that guarantees that the error covariance will be bounded if the existence conditions are satisfied. We call such an algorithm complete. We also show that the error will die out exponentially for any detectable LTI system. Finally, we provide simulations to compare the performance of the algorithm against other known techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it