Rituximab (B‐cell depleting antibody) associated lung injury (RALI): A pediatric case and systematic review of the literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary toxicity of delayed onset is a rare complication of B-lymphocyte depleting antibody therapy and has been almost exclusively reported in older patients with B-cell malignancies. AIMS: To describe a pediatric patient with rituximab-associated lung injury (RALI), to systematically analyze previous reports of pulmonary complications, and to summarize common clinico-pathological features, treatment, and outcome. RESULTS: A teenage boy with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) presented with progressive dyspnea, fever, hypoxemia and fatigue 18 days after the completion of a second course of rituximab infusions for calcineurin inhibitor-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Respiratory symptoms started while he received high-dose prednisone for persistent proteinuria. Bilateral, diffuse ground-glass infiltrates corresponded to the presence of inflammatory cells in the bronchioalveolar lavage fluid. Empiric antibiotic treatment including clarithromycin was given, but the microbiological work-up remained negative. Serum IgE, C3, and C4 concentrations were normal. He recovered within 3 weeks after onset.We systematically reviewed 23 reports describing 30 additional cases of rituximab-associated lung disease. Twenty eight patients had received rituximab for B-cell malignancies, one for graft-versus-host disease and one for immune thrombocytopenia. Median age was 64 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58-69 years). Seventy one percent received concomitant chemotherapy. Time to onset from the last rituximab dose was 14 days (IQR 11-22 days). Eleven of 31 patients required mechanical ventilation, and 9 died (29%). Ventilation was a significant predictor of fatal outcome (odds ratio 46.7; confidence interval 9.5-229.9). High dose glucocorticoid therapy did not improve survival or prevent severe lung disease or death. CONCLUSIONS: With the expanding use of rituximab for novel indications, additional cases of RALI affecting younger age groups are expected to emerge. Mechanical ventilation predicts poor outcome. Glucocorticoids may not be protective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".