Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For a given k ≥ 1, subintervals of a given interval [0, X ] arrive at random and are accepted (allocated) so long as they overlap fewer than k subintervals already accepted. Subintervals not accepted are cleared, while accepted subintervals remain allocated for random retention times before they are released and made available to subsequent arrivals. Thus, the system operates as a generalized many-server queue under a loss protocol. We study a discretized version of this model that appears in reference theories for a number of applications, including communication networks, surface adsorption-desorption processes, and reservation systems. Our primary interest is in steady-state estimates of the vacant space, i.e. the total length of available subintervals kX - ∑ℓ i , where the ℓ i are the lengths of the subintervals currently allocated. We obtain explicit results for k = 1 and for general k with all subinterval lengths equal to 2, the classical dimer case of chemical applications. Our focus is on the asymptotic regime of large retention times.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it