MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042414722 · doi:10.4304/jnw.10.3.141-151

Wi-Fi-based Positioning in a Complex Underground Environment

2015· article· en· W2042414722 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Networks · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceReal-time computingComputer securityHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Underground mining tunnels constitute a very particular environment for radio wave propagation – with characteristics of both indoor and outdoor “regular” environments. This paper shows how a general-purpose Wi- Fi-based indoor positioning system, OwlPS (Owl Positioning System) was adapted to work in that particular environment. A series of experiments, conducted in a formerly exploited gold mine at 70 metres below the surface, across about 400 metres of drifts, is then introduced; it primarily aims at determining the positioning accuracy that can be reached in such a context with a Wi-Fi-based positioning system using the signal strength at 2.4 GHz. The results obtained are improved with a filter, and the mean Euclidean distance error is under 10 metres in most cases when the terminal is carried by an operator; this makes OwlPS usable as is for asset management and emergency positioning of workers underground.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it