MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042500338 · doi:10.1109/coase.2013.6653921

Analysis and development of self-reconfigurable open kinematic machinery systems

2013· article· en· W2042500338 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinematicsSCARAControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringComputer scienceControl systemOffset (computer science)Robot kinematicsLyapunov functionJoint (building)Nonlinear systemRobotEngineeringMobile robotControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the analysis and development of the model, dynamics and control of new self-reconfigurable machinery systems. These machinery systems combine as many properties of different open kinematic structures as possible and can be used for a variety of applications. The kinematic design parameters, i.e., their Denavit-Hartenberg (D-H) parameters, can be modified to satisfy any configuration required to meet a specific task. By varying the joint twist angle parameter (configuration parameter), the presented model is reconfigurable to any desired open kinematic structure, such as Fanuc, ABB and SCARA robotic systems. The joint angle and the offset distance of the D-H parameters are also modeled as variable parameters (reconfigurable joint). The resulting self-reconfigurable machinery system hence encompasses different kinematic structures and has a reconfigurable joint to accommodate any required application. Using the Newton-Euler (N-E) recursive approach, the dynamic parameters of a reconfigurable joint are calculated and presented. A nonlinear control law is developed for a general reconfigurable joint using Lyapunov second method achieving asymptotic stability and the required performance objectives. Automatic model generation of a 3-DOF reconfigurable machinery system is constructed and demonstrated as a case study which covers all possible open kinematic structures. This research is intended to serve as a foundation for future studies in reconfigurable control systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicModular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207