MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042680763 · doi:10.1155/2014/843961

Special Invertebrate Models and Integrative Medical Applications: Regulations, Mechanisms, and Therapies

2014· article· en· W2042680763 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEvidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Utilization and Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)InvertebrateBiologyEcologyEnvironmental ethics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This special issue of eCAM has brought together several unique investigators interested in invertebrate animal models. Investigators would benefit by examining advances and applications of findings derived from useful terrestrial and marine invertebrate animal models. Results derived from well-defined evidence-based approaches are usually relevant to humans; the advantages are numerous, inexpensive, and noncontroversial and are not subject to rigid, ethical, or moral guidelines. In the historical context, these animals have been crucial in many cultures before the advent of industrial medicines thus providing the only source of aid. Now, there is a move to return to or at least to include these practices lest they disappear since, in certain cultures, they represent the sole source of useful health remedies. However, evidence-based medicine emphasizes the importance of subjecting animal products to rigorous analysis. Results are then standardized and serve to educate populations including those that use exclusively western practices. eCAM stands ready to accept the importance and contributions of bees as valuable sources of beneficial activities (pollination) and products (honey and propolis) that for centuries have enhanced human lives as food and medicine. Others include corals, millipedes, maggots, and earthworms. Corals are marine invertebrates that live in compact colonies. Humans have learned that they are useful in the manufacture of jewelry and chemical compounds that are useful against cancer, AIDS, and pain and serve as skeletons during bone grafting. Millipedes are arthropods (the same group as shrimps, crabs, butterflies, and bees) which in some cultures are used during pregnancy and as cures for fever, wounds, earaches, and hemorrhoids and food among the Bobo people of Burkina Faso when crushed; sometimes they are boiled and eaten in tomato sauce. Since the time of Napoleon and even centuries earlier, maggots have been used especially in patients with severe intractable wounds caused by nerve degeneration that results from diabetes. In fact, leeches and maggots are now valuable components of the emerging field of biotherapy, the therapeutic use of living creatures to clean gangrenous tissue often found in ulcers, burns, and postoperative infections. Earthworms are experiencing growing popularity due to their many applications including sources of high protein as food and the production of an anticlotting agent known as lumbrokinase that dissolves blood clots in patients. Aside from observations and usefulness by the layman, certain techniques are valuable as molecular biologists strive to understand the minute structure of molecules in order to improve therapies. Let us not forget the contributions of earthworms as tillers of the soil which enhance agricultural output. Earthworms keep the soil aerated by their constant churning which makes for improved yield of plants regardless of the proposed use. Chih-Yang Huang Edwin L. Cooper Catherine Fang-Yeu Poh Wei-Wen Kuo Tung-Sheng Chen Ronald Sherman

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it