MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042740841 · doi:10.1063/1.1516858

Chemical structure of Al/LiF/Alq interfaces in organic light-emitting diodes

2002· article· en· W2042740841 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOLEDX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyCathodeBilayerLayer (electronics)Materials scienceDiodeAluminiumOrganic semiconductorOptoelectronicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryChemical engineeringNanotechnologyPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Al/LiF cathode/organic is known to form an excellent interface for electron injection into the organic active layer, resulting in excellent performing organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs). Here, the chemical structure of the interface between the Al/LiF bilayer cathode and tris (8-hydroxyquinoline) aluminum (Alq) of working OLED devices was investigated by using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Using a in situ peel-off technique, we are able to characterize the buried interface structure without disturbing the chemical states of each element probed. The data show that there are two types of F at the interface; one is attributed to LiF and the other to F attached to the Alq. This F-doped Alq layer could induce a downshift in molecular orbital levels and thus leads to a reduced electron injection barrier. XPS depth profile results show significant O diffusion through Al layer to the interface, and the diffusion of O ends abruptly at the Al/LiF interface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it