MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Priapism Associated With the Switch From Oral to Injectable Risperidone

2006· article· en· W2042867524 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Psychopharmacology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPriapismRisperidoneMedicineOlanzapineDopamine antagonistClozapinePharmacologyAnesthesiaAntagonistPsychiatryInternal medicineSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Receptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Priapism is a rare, but serious, side effect of psychotropic medications. Psychotropic medication-induced priapism is believed to be caused by the alpha-adrenergic antagonism of these medications. Among the atypical antipsychotics, cases of priapism or prolonged erection have been associated with clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and quetiapine. Risperidone has primarily serotonergic, dopaminergic, and alpha-adrenergic antagonist properties. It has one of the highest affinities for the alpha1-adrenergic receptor blockade among the atypical antipsychotics. To date, there are 17 case reports of risperidone-associated priapism either in monotherapy or in combination with other psychotropics. To our knowledge, there are no published case reports of priapism on the injectable preparation of risperidone. We report a case of a 50-year-old man who developed priapism while being switched from the oral to the intramuscular preparation of risperidone. The importance of early recognition and intervention in cases of priapism is emphasized. The treatment of priapism with benztropine and other methods is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it