MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043144419 · doi:10.1017/s0266078406001076

Tolkien the storyteller

2006· article· en· W2043144419 on OpenAlexaff
R. E. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish Today · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsPricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEPICArtArt historyHistoryLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 20th century’s most popular novelist? – the third of three articles. The year 2005 marks the 50th anniversary of the publication of J.R.R. Tolkien’s prose epic The Lord of the Rings: voted ‘the book of the century’ in a poll conducted in 1997 by the UK book retailer Waterstones and ‘the UK’s best loved book’ in a BBC survey carried out in 2003. TLOTR was adapted to the screen in 2001 by the New Zealand-based director Peter Jackson and released, to widespread acclaim, in three parts between 2001 and 2003. The present is the third of three linked discussions of Tolkien’s work and the media through which it has been channelled (text and film), and of why it has been so phenomenally popular.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish TodaySame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207