MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043147668 · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e31827ada02

Hearing in Time

2013· review· en· W2043147668 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEar and Hearing · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Music Perception
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerceptAuditory systemAudiologyAuditory perceptionAuditory scene analysisAuditory cortexAuditory neuropathyPerceptionPsychologyAuditory maskingBinaural recordingTime perceptionNeuroscienceHearing lossAcousticsPhysicsMedicineOctave (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief This article reviews the temporal aspects of human hearing as measured using the auditory evoked potentials. Interaural timing cues are essential to the detection and localization of sound sources. The temporal envelope of a sound—how it changes in amplitude over time—is crucially important for speech perception. Time is taken to integrate, identify, and dissolve auditory streams. These temporal aspects of human hearing can be examined using the auditory evoked potentials, which measure the millisecond-by-millisecond activity of populations of neurons as they form an auditory percept. Important measurements are the time taken to localize sounds on the basis of their interaural time differences as measured by the cortical N1 wave, the contribution of the vocal cord frequency and phonemic frequency to the perception of speech sounds as indicated by the envelope-following responses, the temporal integration of sound as assessed using the steady state responses, and the duration of auditory memory as shown in the refractory periods of the slow auditory evoked potentials. Disorders of temporal processing are a characteristic feature of auditory neuropathy, a significant component of the hearing problems that occur in the elderly, and a possible etiological factor in developmental dyslexia and central auditory processing disorders. Auditory evoked potentials may help in the diagnosis and monitoring of these disorders. The auditory evoked potentials can be used to evaluate the temporal processing of sounds in the human brain. The N1 wave of the transient response to changes in interaural timing can measure binaural interaction; envelope-following responses can evaluate the processing of speech; and the auditory steady state responses can track temporal integration in both brain stem and cortex. The evoked potentials can thus provide objective information that might help in the diagnosis and monitoring of disorders of temporal processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it