MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043498421 · doi:10.1080/00207543.2010.518993

Complexity analysis of an operation in demand-based manufacturing

2010· article· en· W2043498421 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Production Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction (economics)Computer scienceFeature (linguistics)Learning curveDemand patternsIndustrial engineeringMathematical optimizationOperations researchMathematicsDemand managementEconomicsEngineeringMicroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In demand-based production systems with stochastic demand arrival times, operations often take place in random and long-time intervals. Therefore, traditional learning curve models may not be a good fit for estimating the operation time (OT) in such production environments. Moreover, the complexity of an operation is another influential factor in OT that is not quantified. In this article, human cognitive and complexity factors in demand-based production systems with stochastic demand arrival time are studied. Performing statistical analysis, a double segment learning curve is developed that is a best fit for OT with breakpoint feature. The breakpoint indicates the required number of orders received to reach the mastery level of performing a certain operation. A comparative analysis among existing and the double segment learning curve models is performed and the operation complexity measure is derived from the model. Keywords: human cognitivecomplexitylearning curvedemand-based production systemsstochastic demand times

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it